国产精品乱码一区-性开放网站-少妇又紧又爽视频-西西大胆午夜人体视频-国产极品一区-欧美成人tv-四虎av在线-国产无遮挡无码视频免费软件-中文字幕亚洲乱码熟女一区二区-日产精品一区二区三区在线观看-亚洲国产亚综合在线区-五月婷婷综合色-亚洲日本视频在线观看-97精品人人妻人人-久久久久久一区二区三区四区别墅-www.免费av-波多野结衣绝顶大高潮-日本在线a一区视频高清视频-强美女免费网站在线视频-亚洲永久免费

機械社區

標題: Should I Become a Design Engineer or an Engineering Analyst? [打印本頁]

作者: eddyzhang 時間: 2015-10-1 23:26
標題: Should I Become a Design Engineer or an Engineering Analyst?
下面是一個專業人士給的一個建議，原文地址鏈接：
https://caeai.com/blog/should-i-become-design-engineer-or-engineering-analyst

Roughly twenty-five years ago when finite element analysis was becoming mainstream, the career path for a young engineer led to a distinct fork in the road: Are you going to become a designer or an analyst? The designer's role was to lay out the new and innovative design concepts.  The analyst’s job was to make sure they worked. The designer was the idea guy who would create on the back of an envelope. The analyst was the guy who could derive partial differential equations and cleverly simplify complex problems into 2-d analytical models.

With today’s advances in software and hardware, the difference between designer and analyst is a lot less clear-cut.  The most effective designers leverage early adoption of analytical models, such that the first pass prototypes are more efficient and reliable.  The analyst can take advantage of tools like design optimization to not just provide a pass/fail response, but play a major role in shaping the final design.  In both scenarios, the key to success is proper education in their expanded roles.  The designer needs to understand the physics behind the FEA / CFD solutions and the analyst needs to understand the “big picture” design goals.

With the continued adoption of 3D Printing, many limitations related to fabrication have been removed.  More innovative analytical-based geometrical solutions can now become real design solutions.  Analytical tools have become faster and easier to use so that the combined designer and analyst can quickly assess a prototype’s viability.  The new AIM platform launched by ANSYS is a tool specifically developed for this type of application.  In this example, the SpaceClaim concept modeling geometry tool is coupled with the ANSYS Multiphysics analytical tool to allow the engineer to expand their capabilities into both domains.  New analysis-based geometry can be ported directly to the 3D Printer.  Up-front analytical modeling will reduce the physical prototyping and produce a more reliable product.  For example, local stress concentration areas susceptible to early fatigue failure can be engineered out of the part from the start.

The blurring of the dividing line between analyst and designer is also showing up in the current job market. Educational requirements and pay for entry level opportunities for both design engineers and engineering analysts are very similar.  (Not that pay should be a determining factor in entering any profession!) I once was asked by a young engineer: “Which would pay me more in the long term? Continue with my education and get my Ph.D., or start working now after I just finished my Masters?” My response:  “Go get an MBA instead and go into finance if all you care about is money, because unless you love solving problems you should not be an engineer!” I am not saying that you can’t make an excellent living as an engineer, but finding a profession that you love is much more important than money for happiness.

So, for all those problem solvers out there, the future looks bright!  With a host of new tools available to innovate, whether you decide to call yourself a designer or an analyst, educate yourself first on the fundamentals and then embrace these new tools.  We need your creativity to develop better engineered innovations.

作者: ValleyViews 時間: 2015-10-2 01:23
I agree with the writer. However, there exist a lot of conflicts between real self and ideal self.

作者: 陽光小院暖茶 時間: 2015-10-2 06:20
What the hell is it?

作者: wdennisw 時間: 2015-10-2 07:29
from my piont, a designer should have both of them.

作者: 東海fyh126 時間: 2015-10-2 09:41
cao，dou zai zhuan sha zhuang a。

作者: chase_1987 時間: 2015-10-2 09:58
同意，設計工程師和分析工程師的界限將會越來越模糊。隨著軟件的發展，分析可能成為設計工程師的必備技能。

作者: 李二洋 時間: 2015-10-2 10:58

東海fyh126 發表于 2015-10-2 09:41 - Y9 U/ K7 a: g6 P! v ^/ i3 z
cao，dou zai zhuan sha zhuang a。

dui

作者: 咖咖啡 時間: 2015-10-2 14:01
apparently，in the world ,the engineer in mechanical industry is't rich ,
hollyshit

作者: -[.赱.開. 時間: 2015-10-2 15:59
I agree with what you said,' finding a profession that you love is much more important than money for happiness'.

作者: 一展刀鋒 時間: 2015-10-2 19:09
learn the basic knowledge well, and then you can work on both

作者: 迷茫的維修 時間: 2015-10-2 21:31
goog good study .day day up

作者: 迷路的熊 時間: 2015-10-2 21:37
the question is still here.if I can't earn enough money.how could I insist to be an engineer.otherwise,Mba or finance may be good for me,but I already decide to learn computer.

作者: 祺哈哈哈 時間: 2015-10-3 13:11
i think a good engineer require not only design but also analyst ability…if someone is poor at either of them,he might meet giant obstacle druing his design process

作者: HUGO97 時間: 2015-10-5 17:11
@2266998

作者: threetigher 時間: 2015-10-5 21:48

東海fyh126 發表于 2015-10-2 09:41
3 F. q' P# G/ t8 J' q; K# B" w3 scao，dou zai zhuan sha zhuang a。

哈哈。大小寫，單復數，is't, 不勝枚舉，太爛了。

WTF！

No more zhuangbility, erbility or shability!

Because zhuangbility leads to leipility!

歡迎光臨機械社區 (http://www.whclglass.com.cn/)